Hedging deal dispute to be settled

Hedging deal dispute to be settled


A high powered legal team headed by Attorney General Mohan Peiris has been successful in negotiating with three foreign banks that had entered into the hedging agreement with the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC) to settle the dispute between the two parties amicably.

A source close to the official negotiating team told the Daily Mirror yesterday that the Deutsche Bank, CITI Bank and the Standard Chartered Bank of England have even agreed to come to a compromise after Sri Lanka took the position that the hedging agreement signed between the CPC and the banks was basically ultra-vires and against the bilateral and international norms of financial agreements based on Investment Protection Treaty.

Following the Supreme Court ruling given against the agreement the three foreign banks had invoked arbitration demanding US$ 64 million by the Deutsche bank, US$ 103 million by the Standard Chartered Bank and US$ 94 million by the CITI bank from the CPC.The legal team has been able to save about Rs. 28 billion for the country following its successful performance before the arbitration panel in Singapore and commercial High Court in London, he added.

It was of paramount importance to sign the ISDA (International Swap Dealers Association) –a derivative agreement- together with the principal hedging agreement. They had failed to sign it an were not entitled to any extra payment.    

“The position taken by the Supreme Court was that the contract entered between the three foreign banks and the CPC was ultra-vires as it was against the instructions of the Central Bank (CB). The CB on the recommendations of the Mandate Study Group appointed to look in to the subject had recommended to enter into small quantities for shorter periods of hedging on Zero Cost Collar basis. But the agreement went out of this mandate and had signed in to bulk buying on the insistence of the three foreign banks. In short it was a corrupt deal,” the source emphasized.

In fact the study group’s recommendations went to the cabinet and the CPC was instructed by the cabinet to go in to smaller quantities for shorter periods. In turn the CPC board instructed Deputy Finance Manager to enter into an appropriate agreement in accordance with the cabinet instructions but the CPC had done exactly the opposite, he said.

“In short this is a case of misleading and breach of treaty. The three foreign banks now want to settle this amicably on mutually beneficial terms. They do not want to confront Sri Lanka. They have no other choice. Hence, the payment of compensation to the three banks is slim. We have filed our answers with the arbitration panel in Singapore and Commercial High Court in London, he said.

An order from London and Singapore is expected by early April or in June.

Other members of the Sri Lankan team comprised Senior State Counsel Janak De Silva and Senior Stat counsel Milinda Gunatilaka assisted by Senior State Counsel in London, Prof. James Crawford and a world authority on state responsibility.

/ English

Share the Post


No comment yet.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *